header_education

Invasive Education

Technological Advancements in Lesion Assessment

User rating
 
0.0 (0)
Technological Advancements in Lesion Assessment

For over thirty years, cardiologists and technologists have been looking up at the cardiac cath lab angiography screen and asking each other, “What do you think?” “What should we do about that lesion?” “Is this stenosis severe enough for the patient to benefit from intervention?” These questions were followed with multiple views and contrast injections. Unfortunately, the additional radiation exposure and contrast would rarely yield a definitive answer to these questions. However, thanks to advances in interventional cardiology, physicians who practice evidence-based medicine have at their disposal two technologies. These technologies can provide definitive answers to questions of lesion significance and direct appropriate medical and interventional therapies. The technologies that offer this supporting evidence are Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS). FFR can determine if a suspect lesion is limiting the flow of blood to the heart muscle, causing ischemia; while IVUS can differentiate the disease pathology, plaque burden and true cross-sectional area of the culprit lesion. These tools serve as guides in interventional therapy, determining stent expansion and apposition in an effort to achieve optimal patient results.

Read more...

Radiation Safety in the Workplace

User rating
 
0.0 (0)
Radiation Safety in the Workplace

Radiation safety is a primary focus in the diagnostic and invasive cardiovascular workplace. As healthcare providers working with radiation on a daily basis, it is important to examine some of the measures taken to ensure our protection from these harmful waves.

Read more...

Comparison of the Radiation Dosages Between Interventional and Non-Interventional Cardiologists During Routine Angiography

User rating
 
0.0 (0)
Comparison of the Radiation Dosages Between Interventional and Non-Interventional Cardiologists During Routine Angiography

Winner of the Affiliates Award at CSANZ 2005 (Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand) and has been accepted to the 4th Australasian Conference on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2006).

In the performance of coronary arteriography there is a need to address the health and safety concerns about radiation exposure for patients and staff.  Factors influencing radiation dose are body mass index (BMI), number of acquisition runs per study, and screening (fluoro) time.  The aim of this study is to determine if there is any difference in radiation dose during routine angiography between the interventional cardiologists (IC) and the non-interventional cardiologists (NIC).  Over an 18 month period we compared radiation dose during routine angiography excluding graft studies, aortic views and views for closure devices.

Read more...

Page 2 of 2

2
Next
End



3308_mckesson_side